On Sunday November 9th, the Stuart News wrote an article
that was highly critical of WAAM

WAAM's has responded to that article and asked the Stuart News publish our response in it's entirety.

 

Response to Stuart News Editorial
Lynne Pine, President
Witham Airport Action Majority

November 11, 2003

 

The Stuart News Editorial on Sunday, November 9, was an obvious attempt to promote airport growth. Unfortunately, it used inaccurate and misleading rhetoric. After years of having little or no verifiable information, the community now has the Airport Exploratory Study (AES) in hand. The AES should have put such rhetoric to rest.  Editorializing? To be expected. But a blatant disregard for accuracy, is not.
Readers deserve responsible journalism. 

From the Editorial

Wrong - “the county would be unable to gain control of the airport for 28 years”
Fact
– the County can de-federalize (stop taking grants) immediately.  Peter Kirsch, the leading aviation attorney in the United States, has stated, “the grant obligations are for the useful life of the improvements or 20 years, not 28 years.” Airport leases allow for downsizing and can be bought out.

Misleading - “County taxpayers would have to pick up an ever-increasing share of the cost of operating the field” 
Fact – The Stuart News continues to ignore the fact that airport property is not on the tax rolls and therefore pays no taxes. Profits on the airport must stay on the airport for the benefit of the airport only. So we lose a huge ad valorem tax base and all profits realized from airport leases are also lost. This would change when the airport is de-federalized.

The money generated from what is now untaxable airport property will, if downsized, go into the tax rolls.  Revenue generated from additional County leases will offset the Federal and State grants that the airport currently receives. A downsized airport would be self-sustaining and use of excess airport property would benefit the entire community.

Wrong - “Some of the proposals may violate FAA Restrictions”
Fact – FAA restrictions will not be violated. Grant assurances will be violated, which is quite different. The penalty? No more grants. Affect on the community?  The Jetport stops growing.

Misleading “[WAAM] might start by supporting the county’s soundproofing of homes near the airfield and buying the most vulnerable ones outright.”
Fact - WAAM supports offering the home buyout option, as quickly as possible, to those homeowners most severely affected who want to participate in the buyout program.  The sole reason for the delay in implementing this program is because the recommendations of the Part 150 Study are under review for approval by the FAA, due January 2004.  Once approved by the FAA, the question of funding must still be considered.   We are told that, due to the cost of implementing Homeland Security measures, Federal funding is not readily available at this time. 

Why haven’t we heard more about the proposed insulation program? Perhaps the airport growth advocates don’t want us to know the real cost. The cost to insulate will be enormous, initially at least $12.5 million, and millions more as the program progresses. Other factors to consider include:

1. Insulating homes does nothing to solve the air pollution problem

2. We didn’t come to Florida to live sealed up in our homes, unable to enjoy the beautiful climate.

3. Many homes outside the insulation area will continue to be assaulted by the continued increase of noise and air pollution from jets flying overhead.

4. The buyout and insulation programs force the existing community to conform to the airport, not the other way around. Continued expansion of airport operations increases the possibility of more buyout and insulation programs to encompass a growing number of homes.


Once a year the community puts aside its objections and joins in the celebration of aviation at the Stuart Air Show. We do so because the Air Show supports a good cause, and the entertainment is something the entire community can enjoy. But, the Air Show is only 2 days each year - quite different from the constant assault of jets overhead 24/7. 

Home to local pilots and aviation enthusiasts, for more than fifty years historic Witham Field was a welcome neighbor to all.  The lust for high dollars brought in by jet traffic should not be allowed to drive out these friendly aviators, and yet it is happening today. 

Our cause is not against aviation; it is about airport expansion that now encroaches on long established neighborhoods. Many in our community are bombarded by the noise and air pollution of a growing jetport, and even more will suffer as the airport continues to expand operations.  When will it stop? Only when the county takes control back from the FAA and downsizes the airport. Anything less will lead our community down the road to disaster.

The results of the Airport Exploratory Study (AES) have removed relocation or closure from realistic consideration. The proposed downsizing options in the AES are not the “posturing” and “impossible demands” of WAAM.  They are being offered by Peter Kirsch, nationally respected aviation attorney and long time consultant to the County Commission, and are “ensuring progress toward compromise” contrary to the rhetoric of the Stuart News.

Downsizing is a compromise measure; a balance which must be struck between financial interests and quality of life in the surrounding communities.  Doing nothing is not an acceptable alternative.  Doing nothing is, in fact making a choice – the choice to continue expanding a jetport in the heart of Stuart and Martin County. Funding the airport through the grant process is still taxpayer funding, it’s just coming out of a different pocket. 

Again from Peter Kirsch:  Mr. Kirsch told an audience at a meeting of the American Association of Airport Executives that “if community airports accept FAA funds, they've made a bargain with the devil: the FAA will open airports virtually to any aircraft regardless of noise impact or weight, day or night.”

On December 2, the Martin County Commission will undertake the task of deciding which of the 10 downsizing options presented in the Airport Exploratory Study should be implemented first. Our Commissioners’ decisions on this complex issue will have far-reaching consequences for generations to come. We all love and cherish the unique nature that surrounds us.
WAAM and its growing membership of thousands remain committed to preserving our quality of life in Martin County.